Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: MICOMBINE & GLLAMM


From   "Rodrigo A. Alfaro" <ralfaro76@hotmail.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: Re: MICOMBINE & GLLAMM
Date   Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:05:07 -0400

Dan,

I wrote a program called mira to compute
MI regression analysis... it has the same idea
as micombine... 

net from http://people.bu.edu/ralfaro/stata/

I think that it works for your case. If not
You can change it for your purpose

Rodrigo.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan MacNulty" <macn0007@umn.edu>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: st: MICOMBINE & GLLAMM


Has anyone faced the problem of imputing missing values in the context 
of a multi-level random effects model? ICE works for generating the 
imputed datasets, but GLLAMM is apparently not a certified regression 
command for MICOMBINE. To get around this I'm considering running GLLAMM 
on each imputed dataset and somehow combining results manually, though I 
fear this may be a naive approach. I'd be grateful to learn how others 
have handled this problem.

Dan MacNulty
Dept. of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior
University of Minnesota

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index