Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: logit with sample selection


From   "Maarten Buis" <M.Buis@fsw.vu.nl>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: logit with sample selection
Date   Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:32:35 +0200

--- Ian Watson wrote:
> For example, if participation has two outcomes (working or not working),
> and you want an inverse mills ratio for the working outcome:
> 
> logit work  age edu children region
> capture drop phat
> capture drop imr
 >predict phat if e(sample), xb
> gen imr = normden(phat)/norm(phat)

I am not so sure. As I understand, the IMR is derived from the assumption
that the error terms in the selection equation and the wage equation 
together form a bivariate normal distribution. In this logistic 
framework they would form a bivariate logistic distribution and this animal
is a lot less pretty (or less extensively studied) than the bivariate normal.
I could be wrong though.
HTH,
Maarten

-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology 
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 
Boelelaan 1081 
1081 HV Amsterdam 
The Netherlands

visiting adress:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434 

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index