[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: logit with sample selection
On 9/24/06, Nishant Dass <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I would like to estimate a logit model with sample
selection but since there's only -heckprob- available in
Stata, I was wondering whether it would be incorrect to do
the following instead:
1. Estimate the selection equation using -logit-.
2. Calculate the inverse Mills' ratio (IMR).
3. Use the IMR from above as a regressor in a second-stage
I wonder if this approach is correct, i.e. if there is a theoretical
justification for it. I have never seen one (but this may reflect my
ignorance ...;-)) Even if the approach is correct, you will have to
correct the standard errors in your second step regression.
A much better approach would be to choose a probit model. In Stata you
could then use the -heckprob- command.
Hope this helps,
* For searches and help try: