Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: RE: RE: RE: test for stationarity that accepts the "by" command?


From   "Jason Yackee" <jyackee@law.usc.edu>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: RE: RE: RE: test for stationarity that accepts the "by" command?
Date   Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:41:20 -0700

Scott, thank you for your patient, rapid, and very thorough response.
It seems as if I should definitely purchase the programming manual.

-capture- indeed solves the problem, and the output indicates that the
problem was indeed missing values for a handful of panels for the "gdp"
version of the DV.  In the "absolute value" version of the DV, all
panels had at least one observation, which allowed the loop to run, even
if it didn't print out a full output for the singletons.

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Scott
Merryman
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 2:37 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: RE: RE: RE: test for stationarity that accepts the "by"
command?

Jason,

I suspect it is because the observations do not exist for all levels of
aa_cow.  I would double check this or -set tracedepth 1- and -set trace
on-
to find which cow is causing problems.




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index