Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: RE: RE: test for stationarity that accepts the "by" command?


From   "Scott Merryman" <smerryman@kc.rr.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: RE: RE: test for stationarity that accepts the "by" command?
Date   Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:39:13 -0500

All of Nick's "Speaking Stata" articles in the Stata Journal are very good
and well worth reading.

Scott


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-
> statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Jason Yackee
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:25 PM
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Subject: st: RE: RE: test for stationarity that accepts the "by" command?
> 
> Scott, thank you much.  This works brilliantly.
> 
> I am still getting a mental handle on all of the syntax, but your code
> works and it generally makes sense to me.  Incidentally, Nick's 2002
> article discussing how -foreach- works is very helpful for the novice
> like me:
> http://www.cpc.unc.edu/services/computer/presentations/statatutorial/cox
> _article.pdf
> 
> Jason
> 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index