Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: value labels in output regression model


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: value labels in output regression model
Date   Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:21:43 +0100

Let's distinguish two things. 

-xi: regress- for example gives you, mostly, the 
output of -regress-. If you don't like it, it is 
largely because what -xi- does in naming variables 
and what -regress- does in using variable names, 
not labels. -xi- as such does not emit much. 

My own posting in this thread was misleading in 
not emphasising that a third possibility, that 
some user has done the programming job for you, although 
I doubt I'm the only person to be confused by 
all the re-formatting/reporting programs which exist, 
and to want StataCorp to do it "properly" (which 
means my way...). 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Richard Williams
 
> At 11:20 AM 8/3/2006, Roger Harbord wrote:
> >You may like to take a look at Tony Brady's -reformat- package. Type 
> >-ssc describe reformat- for more info.
> 
> Although it is convenient, I've always disliked the xi command 
> because the output is so ugly.  I'm glad to see these different 
> suggestions - I'm going to try them out. Thanks.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index