Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: str2ph and cluster


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: str2ph and cluster
Date   Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:10:32 +0100

Run the program with and without using this option previously
to  see whether it makes any difference. 

On my understanding, "valid" is not necessarily the 
best word here. -str2ph- is just a way of putting 
a number on agreement between observed and predicted, 
using a likelihood approach. That can be useful, 
but it is not totemic. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Jane Skinner
 
> I have a question about Patrick Royston's str2ph command to
> calculate explained variation in survival analysis, which I am using
> with stcox.
> 
> Are the results of str2ph still valid if the "cluster" option is
> used to adjust standard errors for intragroup correlation?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index