Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: Robust with xttobit


From   "Scott Merryman" <smerryman@kc.rr.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Robust with xttobit
Date   Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:08:47 -0500

You can estimate a random effects tobit with -gllamm-, which does provide a
robust option.  See

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-02/msg00708.html

and

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-02/msg00789.html


Scott


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-
> statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Niru
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 8:02 AM
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Subject: st: Robust with xttobit
> 
> Hello, I had posted this two weeks ago and since I
> didn't get a response, I'm posting it one last time,
> desparately hoping to get some response.
> Thanks.
> 
> Dear Statalisters,
> 
> I am using random effect tobit estimation and would
> like to get robust standard errors. But "robust" and
> "cluster" options are not allowed with "xttobit".
> 
> I also tried to use "xtintreg" (random effects
> interval data regression) with "robust" option but
> this is not allowed either.
> Is there any way to get robust standard errors with
> "xttobit"?
> 
> I would greatly appreciate any help,
> thank you in advance.
> 
> Niru



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index