Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: test for time trend


From   "Cornelia Schmidt" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Re: test for time trend
Date   Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:03:57 +0000

Dear Mike and Clive,

thank you very much for your suggestions. To provide a bit more information:
the dependent variable of my analysis is education spending (% GDP). I decided to limit the period under investigation to 1980-2000. The panel is highly unbalanced due to a large number of missings on the dependent variable.

In order to test whether there is a positive time-trend in he education spending data, I first did a Fisher test for panel data. Compared to other stationarity tests, it has the advantage of being feasible for unbalanced panels. Based on the p-values of individual unit root tests, it assumes that all series are non-stationary under the null hypothesis against the alternative that at least one series in the panel is stationary. This reveals drawbacks of the test. In my analysis, I would actually be interested in testing a null assuming stationarity of the data. The p-values of the Fisher test do not tell anything about that. If the null hypothesis is rejected this does not imply that all series are stationary. Therefore, in my opinion, the power of the test is quite limited.

To get a better understanding of whether the series of some countries are non-stationary, I tried to run time-series stationarity-tests for every country. And here I have some questions: I tried a DF-GLS unit-root test but it seems that it does not work with missings in the time series. Alternatively, I used a Phillips-Perron and an Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit-root test which both worked with my data. Do you know which of these tests best fits? Can they be used alternatively or in which respects do they differ?

The test results indicate that I cannot reject the null hypothesis of non-stationarity for most of the countries. As I have so many missings in my dataset, it is hardly possible to use a first-difference estimation to correct for the time trend. Do you know an alternative way? Would it be an option to take a time variable into the model?

Thank you for your help. Best wishes,

Cornelia




















From: Michael Hanson <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: test for time trend
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:38:40 -0500

On Feb 4, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Cornelia Schmidt wrote:

I know it is a basic question, but it would be great if you could help me.
I have a panel dataset for a sample of 50 countries over a period of 40 years.

How can I test if there is a time trend in the data and how can I correct for it?
Individual trends or common? Deterministic or stochastic? Linear or otherwise? You'll need to provide a bit more information to get an appropriate answer to your question. While you could simply dummy for years, that may be effectively throwing away useful information in the time domain (certainly year dummies won't help identify a time trend); with T = 40 as you have, you may want to consider an explicit model of the time-series process(es) contributing to your data generation process. Hope that helps.

-- Mike

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
_________________________________________________________________
Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden!

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index