Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: arellano-bond twostep


From   Neettukattil Velayudhan Murali <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: arellano-bond twostep
Date   Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:09:25 +1100 (EST)

Hi all,
       I am applying arellano-bond method in an unbalanced panel data for
30 time points(1970-1999) for 14 countries.I am taking 26 time
dummies (discounting four years-due to differencing and taking
lags).When I run the one-step method(see below for the code),I am
getting the result without dropping any variable or dummies.But
when I am doing the two-step(see below for code),it is droping most
of the time dummies as well as the lagged dependent variable
appearing in the RHS.What can be the likely reason and how to solve
it?(When I droped the time dummies in the two-step,stata is not
droping lagged depndent variable)

Looking forward hopefully
Murali

ONE_STEP
xtabond  lny  dum74 dum75 dum76 dum77 dum78 dum79 dum80 dum81 dum82 dum83
dum84 dum85 dum86 dum87 dum88 dum89 dum90 dum91 dum92 dum93 dum94 dum95 
dum96 dum97  dum98 dum99 , noconstant diffvars( lny70 sch70) lags(3)
pre(pop gcf trade,  lagstruct(2,2)) robust artests(2)

TWO-STEP
xtabond  lny  dum74 dum75 dum76 dum77 dum78 dum79 dum80 dum81 dum82 dum83
dum84 dum85 dum86 dum87 dum88 dum89 dum90 dum91 dum92 dum93 dum94 dum95 
dum96 dum97  dum98 dum99 , diffvars( lny70 sch70) lags(3) pre(pop gcf
trade,  lagstruct(2,2))  artests(2) twostep


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index