I've noticed an inconsistency in terminology between SPSS and
Stata. I assume that Stata is "right", but I was wondering if
anybody can shed more light on this.
PLUM is SPSS's ordinal regression routine. It supports various
links, which it calls logit, probit, cloglog (complementary log log),
and nloglog (negative log log).
Using a dichotomous DV, I've run the same models in PLUM and in Stata
using the logit, probit, cloglog, and glm routines. What I have found is that
(1) SPSS and Stata produce the same results for links logit and probit
(2) SPSS's cloglog does not produce the same results as Stata's
cloglog. Rather, cloglog in SPSS produces the same results as the
loglog link in Stata's glm.
(3) SPSS's nloglog link is equivalent to Stata's cloglog link.
Now, it wouldn't be so bad if the 2 programs used different names for
the same thing. But, in this case, they also use the same term,
cloglog, for different things. Further, just looking over the
formulas presented by SPSS & Stata, it isn't obvious to me that one
has a more logical claim to the name cloglog than the other
does. Any insights on this would be appreciated.
