[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
RE: st: Sub-optimal smoothing behavior by stcurve?
Thanks for your explanation and suggestion. I hope that you will decide
to implement boundary kernels as they will be very useful for many
users. Limiting the plot to a range where it is valid is also a good
idea. In the interim, you might also modify your documentation to warn
users of this boundary bias. A problem with the current implementation
is the downward hook at the right end of the estimated hazard curve.
When time denotes age, or is correlated with age, it can be confusing as
to whether this represents a healthy survivor effect or is merely an
artifact of the smoothing algorithm.
[mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Yulia
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: st: Sub-optimal smoothing behavior by stcurve?
William Dupont <william.dupont@Vanderbilt.Edu> asks about behaviour of
-stcurve- at the boundaries:
>I believe that the smoothing behavior for the hazard function plots of
>-stcurve- is less than ideal near the time boundaries.
>I have not attempted to read the -stcurve- code and realize that
>devising smoothing algorithms can be non-trivial. I wondered, however,
>if the program was really working as the authors intended or it there
>might be some way of improving its performance near the time
The algorithm in -stcurve- uses the usual smoothing kernel technique to
estimate hazard function as described in [ST] sts graph on p.292. Due to
the symmetry of the kernel, kernel estimators encounter bias at the
Two solutions to this problem would be
1. Retrict the plot region to not include points near the boundary.
This is something Bill can do himself, and something we are
2. Use boundary kernels to alleviate the bias. This is also
we are considering doing officially.
* For searches and help try: