[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: Interaction
Perhaps I am confused, but if (in equation 1) b2 = .29 than would not a
one-unit change in group be a 29% increase in y?
Regarding Eq. 2: The marginal effect of group on y is not simply b2 but:
b2 + b3*time
and the variance would be:
var[b2] + time^2*var[b3] + 2*time*cov[b2,b3],
where time is at some given value; so whether or not the variable group is
statistically significant cannot be determined solely by the looking at the
coefficient and standard error on group (b2).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:owner-
> email@example.com] On Behalf Of firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:28 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: st: Interaction
> Dear Statalisters,
> My question is in relation to my previous query about interaction terms. I
> have two regression models:
> 1) ln(y)= constant + b1*(time) + b2*(group)
> In this model group is an indicator variable denoting membership in
> group1 or group2. On fiting this model, the value of b2 was .29 indicating
> a 34 percent additional increase in y for the people in group2.
> The second model that I fitted included the interaction between group and
> 2) ln(y)= constant + b1*(time) + b2*(group) + b3*(group*time)
> In this model , the group is not significant but the interaction effect
> is. But the effect of the interaction reduces to 2.6 percent (b1=.0822,
> How does one explain (In plain English) the drastic reduction in the
> effect of time on y for the group2 people between the two models?
> Thank you in advance for any suggestions
> Leny Mathew
* For searches and help try: