Yes...thank you...that seems like a better way to adress this issue.
Thank you,
Alan
On 10/6/05, Nick Winter <[email protected]> wrote:
> This doesn't speak to the numlist limit question, but your code could
> simply use -forvalues- rather than -foreach ... numlist-.
>
> There is no reason to have Stata create and store the numlist, rather
> than simply iterate through the values from 1 to N.
>
> Your code could be:
>
> forvalues i = 1/`l' {
> ...
> }
>
> Or even better,
>
> forvalues i = 1/`=_N' {
> ...
> }
>
> That is, you can skip the -count- and just have Stata evaluate the
> macro expression `=_N'.
>
> --Nick WInter
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
