[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Nick Winter <nw53@cornell.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
RE: st: re: Sample with weights |

Date |
Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:26:19 -0400 |

All I can think of is some sort of iterated thing that plays with the requested sample size, which could be automated.

--Nick

At 10:18 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote:

________________________________________________________Hm, interesting! This is indeed not the kind of selection I wanted. I went for your suggestion, Nick. Which was (for a sample size of 100): (1) Calculate for each company the probability of inclusion. This is (sample size) * (size of company / total of company sizes). So assuming a sample size of 100: . sum size . gen prob = 100 * ( size / r(sum) ) (2) Then select the sample based on these probabilities . gen u = uniform() . gen insamp = u < prob Since the sample size didn't have to be that precise, but had to be substantially lower than 100, it sufficed for me to tweak a little with the number 100 untill I had about the right sample size. I remain interested in a solution which leads to a precise sample size. Thanks for the very helpful suggestions thus far. Willard -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Nick Winter [mailto:nw53@cornell.edu] Verzonden: maandag 3 oktober 2005 15:54 Aan: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Onderwerp: Re: st: re: Sample with weights Doesn't work. First, you need to sort the other direction. But more seriously, this does not generate selection probabilities proportional to size. Consider this code, which creates fake data, then draws 500 samples of 200 using this methed. The graph at the end makes clear that the selection probabilities are not proportional to size: clear set obs 1000 gen firm = _n set seed 12345678 gen size = int(uniform()*100) + 1 gen sampled = 0 forval i=1/500 { gen ppsorder = uniform() * size gsort -ppsorder qui replace sampled = sampled+1 if _n <= 200 drop ppsorder } graph twoway scatter sampled size --Nick WInter At 11:04 AM 10/1/2005, you wrote: >This is simple, produces a sample of exactly the desired size, and I >believe fulfills the condition of the probability of selection being >proportional to size . *Assume "Size" is the company size variable, and >M is the desired sample size gen ppsorder = uniform() * Size >sort ppsorder >keep if _n <= M >drop ppsorder > >Yes, sorting the file is a bit clumsy, but this is presumably a one >time thing, >not something appearing inside a loop. > >Regards, > > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >Mike Lacy >Fort Collins CO USA >(970) 491-6721 office ________________________________________________________ Nicholas J. G. Winter 607.255.8819 t Assistant Professor 607.255.4530 f Department of Government nw53@cornell.edu e Cornell University falcon.arts.cornell.edu/nw53 w 308 White Hall Ithaca, NY 14853-4601 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Nicholas J. G. Winter 607.255.8819 t

Assistant Professor 607.255.4530 f

Department of Government nw53@cornell.edu e

Cornell University falcon.arts.cornell.edu/nw53 w

308 White Hall

Ithaca, NY 14853-4601

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**RE: st: re: Sample with weights***From:*"Willard van Ooij" <w.van.ooij@marktmonitor.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: re: Sample with weights** - Next by Date:
**st: Regression loop and coefficient ooutput** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: re: Sample with weights** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: re: Sample with weights** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |