[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Joseph Coveney <jcoveney@bigplanet.com> |

To |
Statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Sample size for equivalence trials in Stata |

Date |
Sun, 02 Oct 2005 05:14:21 +0900 |

Francesco wrote: . . . I have a continuous outcome (mean number of events).

Regardless of whether you're working with proportions or another data type, simulation would be an option.

This is very interesting, but I don't know how to it... could you help me with an example? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My description of the algorithm was a mess. A follow-up post never cleared the listserver, so I've re-posted it below. To answer your question, you usually wouldn't need to resort to simulation if you have a straightforward experiment with continuous (normal) data. But an example where simulation might come in handy with a linear model is shown below. The fictional scenario is an anticipated repeated-measurements (longitudinal) bioequivalence study with a 2:1 randomization, a baseline measurement and two posttreatment measurements, the second of which is subject to dropout, which is assumed to occur completely at random. Random-effects regression is chosen for analysis, and we'd like to explore sample-size requirements under various assumptions as to the dropout rate, one of which (15% dropout) shown. The set-up also would allow for exploration of various other assumptions, too, for example, magnitude of correlations. I haven't shown the necessary follow-on simulation to estimate the false equivalence-declaration rate. For this, you would introduce a "true" difference, e.g., the delta (boundary value of the null/alternative hypotheses), and then determine how often equivalence is declared. Sample size estimation by simulation is iterative; when you have no idea where to begin, you would typically start with relatively fewer replications at each of a broad range of candidate sample sizes. After refining the range of candidate sample sizes, the number of replications can be increased as desired to improve precision. It's usually not worthwhile fretting too much over precision, given the influence on accuracy of the crudity of assumptions that is typical. Joseph Coveney Lost posting: Let's try that alogrithm again: Start with a candidate sample size, generate a thousand or so datasets under the alternative hypothesis (identical proportions for the two groups), determine the proportion in which the 2-alpha-level confidence interval of the risk difference (ratio) is contained within -delta to +delta (1/delta to delta). Iterate with a larger or smaller candidate sample size until converging upon the desired power. Example: capture program drop mclinsim program define mclinsim, rclass syntax , [corr(real 0) alpha(real 0.05)] /// delta(real) n1(integer) n2(integer) /// DROPout(real) clear tempvar baseline response group id local difference = invnorm(1 - `alpha') // 2 alpha drawnorm `baseline' `response'1 `response'2, /// corr(1 `corr' `corr' \ `corr' 1 `corr' \ /// `corr' `corr' 1) n(`= `n1' + `n2'') clear quietly replace `response'2 = . if uniform() < 0.15 generate byte `group' = _n > `n1' generate int `id' = _n quietly reshape long `response', i(`id') j(`time') quietly xtreg `response' `group' `baseline' `time', i(`id') quietly lincom `group' local difference = `difference' * r(se) return scalar is_equivalent = /// ( (r(estimate) - `difference' > -`delta') & /// (r(estimate) + `difference' < `delta') ) end * * 2:1 randomization; 50% correlation coefficient; 15% dropout rate; * 0.5 SE delta forvalues sample_size = 10(10)40 { simulate is_equivalent = r(is_equivalent), reps(100) nodots /// seed(`=date("2005-10-03", "ymd")'): mclinsim , corr(0.5) /// delta(0.5) n1(`sample_size') n2(`= 2* `sample_size'') drop(0.15) clear summarize is_equivalent, meanonly display in smcl as text "n1: " as result `sample_size' display as text "n2: " as result 2 * `sample_size' display as text "Power: " as result %4.2f r(mean) display } exit * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Error 193 (and plain text messages)***From:*Fred Wolfe <fwolfe@arthritis-research.org>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Version control question** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Sample size for equivalence trials in Stata** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Sample size for equivalence trials in Stata** - Next by thread:
**st: Error 193 (and plain text messages)** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |