[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
RE: st: RE: Generating skewed distributions on closed intervals
Will you be using this new age variable as a dependent/explained/y-variable or as an independent/explanatory/x-variable?
If you are using age as an explained variable you will probably end up in survival analysis, and they have good techniques of dealing with discrete time, so I see no need to invent something new there. See: "An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata" by Mario Cleves, William W. Gould, and Roberto Gutierrez available from Stata Press.
If you will be using age as an explanatory variable than it is good to know that even very coarsely categorized variables often produce good estimates. If you still want to do something about the categorisation, than you would probably want to do some form of multiple imputation. The way to think about it is that there is one age distribution, which was chopped up in bits. You don't want to use different distributions for each age band, since than you would assume a very bumpy overall age distribution. So you would first estimate the parameters of this age distribution. Than if you wanted to draw an age for a person in category 20-30, you would draw from a value this distribution truncated between 20 and 30. You would create multiple datasets this way, estimate the regression or whatever other parameter of interest for each of these datasets, and the mean of these effects would be your estimate controlling for the categorisation of age. However, I repeat that this is probably
more trouble that its worth.
I'd like to be sure that this is what you want, before I spent an afternoon writing Stata code for you.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Reza C Daniels
Sent: donderdag 29 september 2005 12:34
Subject: Re: st: RE: Generating skewed distributions on closed intervals
I tried this in the following way:
set obs 100
-gen z1=invnorm(uniform())- where z>0
-gen z2=ln(z1)- for positively skewed
-gen z3=exp(z1)- for negatively skewed
As I'm sure you know, this gives me the correct shape of the
distributions I'm looking for, but the incorrect range.
So, I still can't solve it.
Maarten Buis wrote:
> It reminds me of an ordered probit problem: you have one unobserved distribution, which is being carved up. Only now you also have information about where the cuts are made. This should be solvable. You might want to look at the log normal instead of the normal though, since no one can get, or has ever been, -2 (even with plastic surgery).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: donderdag 29 september 2005 11:09
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: st: RE: Generating skewed distributions on closed intervals
> Well, I guess wildly the literature you are unaware of
> holds better solutions, but that's an empty comment
> as I don't know what it is. The idea that an age
> distribution is a bunch of little truncated
> Gaussians sitting next to each other on a line sounds
> at best strange to me, but as I said I don't
> understand what your problem is.
> Reza C Daniels
>>There is a literature on this problem that I am aware of. I'm just
>>having trouble with the code in Stata to generate my required results.
>>>Whatever your problem is, it is difficult to believe
>>>that there is not a literature on it, e.g. in demography,
>>>actuarial science, population ecology.
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* For searches and help try:
* For searches and help try: