Radu had problems using -estout- with -oprobit-. -oprobit- is a
multiple equation command (the cutoff parameters are put into
separate equations) and -estout- therefore tries to match
equations by name. Since the dependent variable in Radu's models
differs, each model will have its own coefficients block in the
table produced by -estout-. Furthermore, the -keep()- option
as specified by Radu only keeps coefficients from the first block.
The solution to the problem is to add -equations(1)- to the
-estout- command. Thus, Radu's command should read
. estout ff_* using `mydir'\state_eff_freq.txt, eq(1) ...
ben
Radu wrote:
> I am using -estout- to put together the results of a set of ordered
> probits. Specifically, the relevant part of my dofile looks like this:
>
> ....
> foreach v of local list1 {
> oprobit `v' AP KA TN, cluster(keyid)
> estimates store ff_`v'
> }
> estout ff_* using `mydir'\state_eff_freq.txt, cells(b(star fmt(%9.3f))
> se(par)) keep(AP KA TN) stats(r2_p N, fmt(%9.3f %9.0g)
> labels(psR-squared)) style(tab) replace
> ....
>
> However, in the output file, only the first column of results is
> shown, the other remaining blank. I know for sure that the ordered
> probits run fine for all my dependent variables so I'm thinking the
> problem lies within -estout-. Furthermore, when I am using -estout-
> with regular probits (for a different set of dependent variables), I
> can collect the results just fine ...
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
