Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Re: The speed of the MFX command and Stata 9


From   Thomas Cornelißen <cornelissen@mbox.iqw.uni-hannover.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: Re: The speed of the MFX command and Stata 9
Date   Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:23:51 +0200

Friedrich,
my initial experience with -mfx- taking more than 39 hours after a -herprob- estimation was based on a model with 44 regressors and 87 000 observations, CPU speed 1,92 Ghz, and the following version of Stata 8:

. update query
Stata executable
folder: D:\Programme\Stata8\
name of file: wstata.exe
currently installed: 23 Jan 2003
latest available: 10 Jan 2005

Indeed, it does not look very updated. I am about to update it and I'll run the model again afterwards to see if there is a difference.
Thomas



--------- Friedrich Hübler wrote:

I would like to hear more about your experience with -mfx-. When you
say that the large model had not finished after 39 hours, are you
talking about Stata 8.0 or Stata 8.2 with all the latest updates? I
recall that the speed of -mfx- was increased significantly after the
initial release of Stata 8.
--- Thomas Cornelißen wrote:
I have made the experience that -mfx- has been considerably speeded
up in Stata 9.
My experience relies on -mfx- after the heteroscedastic probit
model -hetprob-. For example, in one model Stata 8 took 3:24 hours
for -mfx
compute- after -hetprob-, while Stata 9 took 1 minute 24 seconds. A
larger
model hadn't finished after 39 hours in Stata 8, but it took only
10 minutes in Stata 9.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index