Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Collinearity: Why two L's?


From   Tinna <statalist@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Collinearity: Why two L's?
Date   Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:09:03 -0400

ahhhhh!
You learn something new every day.
Thank you m.p.
Tinna

On 9/15/05, Marcello Pagano <pagano@hsph.harvard.edu> wrote:
> COL-
> <http://dictionary.oed.com.ezp2.harvard.edu/cgi/crossref?query_type=word&queryword=collinear&first=1&max_to_show=10&single=1&sort_type=alpha&xrefword=col->
> together + LINEAR
> <http://dictionary.oed.com.ezp2.harvard.edu/cgi/crossref?query_type=word&queryword=collinear&first=1&max_to_show=10&single=1&sort_type=alpha&xrefword=linear>,
> f. L. /l{imac}nea/ line
> 
> Me: col as in collection
> 
> m.p.
> 
> 
> 
> Tinna wrote:
> 
> >Dear Statalisters,
> >
> >Some you you may find this inapropriate on statalist, but I will risk
> >getting shot down here since I have thought about this for a while:
> >
> >Why are there two L's in collinear? One makes more sense to me.
> >   Co (together; joint; jointly; mutually)
> >+ linear (or resembling a line / straight)
> >=colinearity
> >
> >
> >Tinna
> >Native language: Icelandic
> >
> >*
> >*   For searches and help try:
> >*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> >*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
> >
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index