[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Little, Allan" <a.little@lancaster.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit |

Date |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:52:46 +0100 |

1. Firstly I run my mlogit model... mlogit euivar /* > */a16_24 a25_34 a50_spa notbrnuk nonwht hiq_deg hiq_hed hiq_alev hiq_gce hiq_oth /* > */married marsep yeskid buying private cncloth autumn winter spring coh04 if male==1 & NWdum==1, rrr 2. Then I can find the sample proportions >tab euivar if e(sample) e, u, i | Freq. Percent Cum. -------------+----------------------------------- employment | 19,260 80.66 80.66 unemployment | 1,009 4.23 84.89 inactive | 3,608 15.11 100.00 -------------+----------------------------------- Total | 23,877 100.00 3. I use the predict command as follows, and it suggest to me that the predicted probability is equivalent to the sample proportions (above) - e.g. a mean of 80.66 % is equivalent to the probability, 0.8066. .predict p0 p1 p2 if e(sample) (option pr assumed; predicted probabilities) . su p0 p1 p2 Variable Obs Mean p0 23877 .806634 p1 23877 .0422582 p2 23877 .1511078 4. However, using the prvalue command, the 'predicted probability' of employment is calculated to be higher (0.8764). I dont understand why. .prvalue mlogit: Predictions for euivar Predicted probabilities for each category: Pr(y=unemployx): 0.0295 Pr(y=inactivex): 0.0942 Pr(y=employmex): 0.8764 5. Similarly, it is possible to obtain the predicted probability using the following command, which gives the 'predicted probability' of employment=0.8764. Again, is this value different to both the sample proportion and the value given by the 'predict' command. .mfx compute, predict(pr outcome(0)) nose Marginal effects after mlogit y = Pr(euivar==0) (predict, pr outcome(0)) = .87637938 ________________________________ From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu on behalf of Richard Williams Sent: Mon 05/09/2005 16:34 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit At 10:10 AM 9/5/2005, Little, Allan wrote: >Dear all, > >I'm trying to calculate predicted probabilities following a >multinomial logit regression. My dependant variable has three states >- employment (coded 0), unemployment (1) and inactivity (2). > >I would like to calculate the predicted probability, firstly >evaluated at the mean, and secondly evaluated a number of different >specified values. However, I am encountering some apparent >inconsistencies according to which command I use. > >1. If I use 'predict p0 p1 p2 if e(sample)' [option 'pr' is assumed >to be the default]. The predicted probabilities are equivalent to >the proportion (sample mean) for each category. Perhaps some output or at least the actual commands would help. Are you saying that, for every case, the predicted probabilities are the same for each category? I'm not totally clear on what you are doing, since predict is going to give you values for individual cases whereas prvalue gives you a few summary statistics. ------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 FAX: (574)288-4373 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

`<<winmail.dat>>`

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit***From:*Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Estimate marginal effects with interaction terms in non-linnear models.** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |