Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: odds ratio vs. RRR in multinomial logistic regression


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: odds ratio vs. RRR in multinomial logistic regression
Date   Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:04:30 +0100

I don't think this could be much plainer. It 
could be tinkered with as a matter of style, 
but that seems a different issue. Some readers
prefer percents, so you could consider variations
on 

given X, the relative risk of outcome 3 is 85% that of 
outcome 1 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Michelle
 
> Some of the statalist members were kind enough to
> respond to my inquiry a few months ago about
> interpreting multinomial logistic regression and the
> resulting RRR. 
> 
> I received this response about reporting the results: 
> "For the RRR it would be, for example, 'the relative
> risk of outcome 3 associated with X is 0.85 times
> the relative risk of outcome 1 associated with X'."
> 
> This was helpful, but when I wrote it up in my
> dissertation this way, my advisor has told me that I
> need to put it in "plain English." Can anyone help me
> put this sentence into more interpretable language for
> someone who is not very familiar with RRR? 
> 
> I had already written up a detailed description of
> where the RRR comes from and then followed it with the
> results reported as above, but my advisor is still
> requiring a more intuitive or interpretable sentence. 
> 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index