[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Jann, Ben" <ben.jann@soz.gess.ethz.ch> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: Comment indicator * produces error in Mata |

Date |
Tue, 24 May 2005 15:40:11 +0200 |

Scott Merryman wrote: > Within Mata * is monadic operator. See, [M-2] Pointers ... and also a dyadic operator, depending on the context. See [M-2] op_arith. However, my argument is that, whatever meaning * has in Mata, it is unplesant that in one part of an ado file the * comment indicator works as expected, but produces an error in another part (in particular, because other comment indicators do not have this problem). It is clear to me that given the definition of Mata's syntax (see [M-2] Syntax) it would not be possible to distinguish whether * at the beginning of a line is a pointer prefix or a comment indicator and that therefore only one of the two can exist (pointer prefix, in this case). Nontheless, it would be nice if documentation would point out that the * comment indicator does not work with Mata. Maybe it is obvious to C programmers, but sure not to others. ben > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of > Scott Merryman > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 12:09 PM > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: st: RE: Comment indicator * produces error in Mata > > > Within Mata * is monadic operator. See, [M-2] Pointers > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner- > > statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Jann, Ben > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 4:35 AM > > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > > Subject: st: Comment indicator * produces error in Mata > > > > Hi, > > it appears that the * comment indicator, which may be used at > > the beginning of a line to indicate that the line is to be > > ignored (see -help comments-), cannot be used with Mata. > > Example: > > > > : void somefunction() > > > { > > > * display("some text") > > > } > > > > : somefunction() > > some text > > somefunction(): 3257 nonpointer found where pointer > > required > > <istmt>: - function returned error > > (0 lines skipped) > > > > The error also occurs if somefunction() is defined whithin an > > ado file. Other comment indicators like // or /**/ work fine. > > > > If one really thinks hard about how the different comment > > indicators are handeled in Stata, it is not surprising that > > the * comment indicator does not work in Mata. Nonetheless, > > I think that this is bad news for people being accustomed to > > using the * comment indicator. > > > > Even more bad news is that the problem is not mentionned in the > > documentation (at least not in places where one would look for it > > such as -help comment-, [M-1] first, [M-1] ado, [U] 16.1.2, or > > [U] 18.11.2). I hope that this will change in a future update. > > > > grumble... > > ben > > > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: broken stick (piecewise linear) regression** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: rugs, marker labels and legends....** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: the factors of the product of prime numbers** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: rugs, marker labels and legends....** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |