[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
ariley@stata.com (Alan Riley) |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: linux, windows & informal benchmarks |

Date |
Tue, 10 May 2005 10:03:18 -0500 |

Scott de Marchi (demarchi@duke.edu) asked about the relative performance of Stata under 64-bit Windows and 64-bit Linux running on an x86-64 platform: > My prior was to use linux with Stata 9, but I did some very informal > benchmarking before leaping (n.b.: I have both a linux 64-bit and a > windows x64 license). I ran comparisons using the same dual boot machine. > One drive had windows server 2003 64-bit and the other had the 64-bit > version of ubuntu. Hardware: tyan k8we, 2x252 opterons, 8x1gb ocz server > ram, and 1 74gb sata raptor for each os config. > > On a suite of operations that were mle regressions, histograms, summaries, > and some user written code to generate comparisons to benford's law for > large data sets, I found that the windows version of Stata 9 did much > better overall than linux (over the suite, linux took over 50% longer to > finish). I haven't broken this down by task or thought real hard about > weightings of the various items in the suite. It is difficult to comment more on this without knowing more about the tests that were run, but we are very surprised to hear that Linux took over 50% longer to finish. I would like to correspond privately with Scott to experiment on his system and perform more timing tests to determine if there is something causing such a speed difference on his system. Some initial questions that come to mind are - did Scott use the console or the X Windows version of Stata under Linux? - did Scott draw a lot of graphs? If so, was the graph window bigger under one operating system? - did the tests generate a lot of output in the Results window? If so, was the Results window bigger under one operating system? What was the screen resolution, color bit depth, and video card driver used under each operating system? - were some ML routines run that perhaps took a different path to convergence on each system due to different math libraries? - how close was each system to the limit of memory on the computer? If Scott will email me, perhaps we can do some tests on his system this week and report back to the list on any discoveries we might make. --Alan (ariley@stata.com) * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: count (Stata 8)** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: count (Stata 8)** - Previous by thread:
**st: linux, windows & informal benchmarks** - Next by thread:
**st: Evaluating a prediction model - a general statistical question** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |