Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Use of the term 'relative risk ratio'

From   Ronán Conroy <>
Subject   st: Use of the term 'relative risk ratio'
Date   Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:25:56 +0100

I have a reviewer who is grumbling about the use of 'relative risk ratio' to describe the effect estimates from multinomial logistic regression. And it's the second time this has happened. The reviewer feels that they ought to be called odds ratios, to prevent confusion with relative risks (and that is a good point).

I would like to preserve the distinction between vanilla-flavour odds ratios and relative risk ratios, but am a little unhappy that the term is causing more heat than light.

Has anyone else experienced the problem? Is there a more useful way of describing RRRs out there?


Ronan M Conroy ( Senior Lecturer in Biostatistics Royal College of Surgeons Dublin 2, Ireland +353 1 402 2431 (fax 2764) -------------------- Just say no to drug reps

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of The Royal College Of Surgeons in Ireland.


* For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index