[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Seb Buechte <sfbuechte@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Another reshaping problem |

Date |
Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:42:35 +0200 |

Ok, I will it give a try... taking your data expample the following will lead to the desired result: // since alway two obs for within a group belong together and those two obs are // identified by subsequent numbers as present in column "var" // I would build a new subgroup-var, called grp2 // it builds a by-group of "group" ordered according to "var" bysort group (var): gen grp2=round(_n/2,1) // the dataset now looks like this: // group var strategy // group var strategy grp2 // 1 11 0 1 // 1 12 1 1 // 1 13 0 2 // 1 14 1 2 // 2 15 0 1 // 2 16 1 1 // now you create a new groupvar using egen's group command egen grp3=group(group grp2) // now you can do a reshape reshape wide var, i(grp3) j(strategy) // and order the variables order group var0 var1 grp2 grp3 // the dataset now looks like this: // group var0 var1 grp2 grp3 // 1 11 12 1 1 // 1 13 14 2 2 // 2 15 16 1 3 I hope this helps! Kind regards, sebastian ps. personally I would be interested wether there are more sophisticated approaches to the problem described by Sascha.. On 4/15/05, Sascha Robert <sascha.robert@iew.unizh.ch> wrote: > Hi > > ...and sorry to hassle you again with a ridiculous problem. A teacher > once told me: 'There are no dumb questions!', though. Well, there are, > as the protagonists of 'Simple Life' have evidenced, and nontheless I > try it: > > My data in short: > > group var strategy > 1 11 0 > 1 12 1 > 1 13 0 > 1 14 1 > 2 15 0 > 2 16 1 > > If the first two rows would be omited, > > . reshape wide var, i(group) j(strategy) > > would do the trick. The problem is, using all observations, that > multiple observations within 'group' share the same 'strategy'. > > My data, after the reshaping, should look like this: > > group var0 var1 > 1 11 12 > 1 13 14 > 2 15 16 > > Note that my data is in a form that would not produce missing values in > 'var0' and 'var1' (within a 'group' there is always an equal share of > 'strategy' = 0 and 'strategy' = 1). > > Can anybody help? Thankyou. > Sascha > > -- > ***** sascha robert | mailto: sascha.robert@iew.unizh.ch ***** > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- - Seb F Buechte - - Stay tuned! * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Another reshaping problem***From:*Sascha Robert <sascha.robert@iew.unizh.ch>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: Child Growth Charts** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: programation of a new function** - Previous by thread:
**st: Another reshaping problem** - Next by thread:
**st: manipulation of eigenvalues** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |