[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: graph for propensity scores |

Date |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:57:22 +0100 |

Upwards and downwards designs appear popular for no good reason. In effect the reader is expected to be able to pick up one length, transfer it and superimpose it, all in one's head, upon another length. Why this should be easier or more effective than comparing juxtaposed lengths beats me. The same issue arises with left and right (side-by-side) designs such as population pyramids. In each case, small and subtle differences could easily be of interest or importance. The problem with histograms is naturally the loss of detail produced by binning. Often this is unimportant but frequently a researcher does want to be sure that is so. To compare two sets of values qua distributions, -qqplot- is pretty nearly an optimal plot. To compare them as paired values, there are several good methods. A fairly lengthy discussion with references is given in Graphing agreement and disagreement. Stata Journal 4(3): 329--349 (2004) Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk David Harrison > You could do that something like, e.g. > > sysuse auto > twoway__histogram_gen length if !foreign, start(140) w(10) > freq gen(h0 x0) > twoway__histogram_gen length if foreign, start(140) w(10) > freq gen(h1 x1) > replace h1=-h1 > gen zero=0 > twoway (rbar h0 zero x0, barw(10)) (rbar h1 zero x1, barw(10)), /// > yla(-10 "10" -5 "5" 0(5)15) yti(Frequency) /// > legend(label(1 "Domestic") label(2 "Foreign")) > > Note the very handy command -twoway__histogram_gen- (two > underscores in the first gap!) that is not in the Stata > manuals but does have a help file. Hans J. Baumgartner > I am estimating treatment effects using propensity scores. > > To discuss the common support I’d like to graph the scores for the > treated and the controls. > > However, my graph knowledge is very limited and is only sufficient to > generate a graph, where the scores for the treated and the > controls are > displayed next to each other. That is I am using the by(.) option and > the command historgram. > > I’ve seen the scores are displayed upwards for the treated > and mirrored > downwards for the controls in one single graph. > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Antwort: st: RE: RE: graph for propensity scores***From:*"Hans J. Baumgartner" <hbaumgartner@diw.de>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: graph for propensity scores** - Next by Date:
**st: Version 3 Question** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: graph for propensity scores** - Next by thread:
**Antwort: st: RE: RE: graph for propensity scores** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |