Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: Sureg without listwise deletion


From   "Scott Merryman" <smerryman@kc.rr.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Sureg without listwise deletion
Date   Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:37:07 -0600

See Stata Journal 4(4) "From the help desk: Seemingly unrelated regression
with unbalanced equations" A. McDowell


Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-
> statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Neumayer,E
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:10 PM
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Subject: st: Sureg without listwise deletion
> 
> Hi,
> 
> if you do sureg (y x) (z x) then the resulting output will be restricted
> to
> the number of observations that are available for both y, z (and x) at the
> same time, i.e. the sample size is by definition identical. If the number
> of
> available observations for y differs from z, does anyone know how to do
> sureg without listwise deletion, i.e. allowing the full sample size for
> both
> y and z? http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/code/sureg.htm describes how
> to
> do this in Eviews, but ideally I don't want to get familiar with another
> statistical package.
> 
> Any help greatly appreciated,
> 
> Eric
> 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index