[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Clive Nicholas" <Clive.Nicholas@newcastle.ac.uk> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: interaction effect without one of main effects |

Date |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:07:14 -0000 (GMT) |

Mary Lee wrote: > Stata has a unique option in -xi- > i.varname1|varname3 creates dummies for categorical > variable varname1 and includes continuous varname3: > all interactions and main effect of varname3, but not > main effect of varname1. I'm wondering when we can use > this option. Don't we have to always include both main > effects in the model if we want to estimate the > associated interaction effect?? Formally, _all_ lower-order terms have to be included in such 'hierarchical' regression models (somebody else can slap me down if this phrase is inappropriate in this context). So, if your model contains X1*X2, both X1 _and_ X2 must be included as well. This is necessary, because omitting any of the main (singleton) effects could have a large (and misleading) impact on the remaining coefficients. Some may say that one unfortunate side-effect of including all of these is the greatly inflated multicollinearity that it introduces into the model. > Stata manual gives the following example, > xi: logistic outcome bp i.agegrp|weight > My guess is that we can use such a specification if > our focus is to examine the effect of 'weight' on > 'outcome' which is conditional on 'age grp', while the > main effect of 'agegrp' on 'outcome is not > theoretically meaningful. Yet, I'm not statistically > or theoretically convinced whether we are allowed to > estimate the interaction effect without one of the > main effects. I tried to find out any statistical and > theoretical justifications for such a model > specification, but no success.... See above and below for this one. > Can anyone help me understand the usage of > 'i.varname1|varname3'? How do I interpret the result > of the interaction term in this case? Are there any > books or articles explaining the interaction effect > without the main effect? Essentially, you are investigating whether the effect of X1 on Y varies by units of X2. For instance, if my response variable is the propensity to vote at the _next_ election (out of 100) and my key predictor is whether or not they turned out at the _last_ election (0 = no; 1 = yes), an interesting covariate which may intervene upon this relationship is age. If we propose an interaction effect, we are allowing for the possibility that, in this example, past turnout behaviour may be stronger for older (younger) voters than they are for younger (older) ones. A good (pre-publication) paper to look at which covers the basic merits, 'dos' and 'donts' of interaction effects, together with a checklist, has been prepared by Bear Braumoeller (another member of Statalist) which you can view at: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~bfbraum/ It can be found under the 'statistical methodologies' section. Also, two nice little monographs that are devoted entirely to this topic are by Jaccard, Turrisi and Wan (1990) and by Jaccard (2001). I hope all this helps. CLIVE NICHOLAS |t: 0(044)7903 397793 Politics |e: clive.nicholas@ncl.ac.uk Newcastle University |http://www.ncl.ac.uk/geps References: Jaccard J, Turrisi R and Wan C (1990) INTERACTION EFFECTS IN MULTIPLE REGRESSION, QASS Series Paper 07-072, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Jaccard J (2001) INTERACTION EFFECTS IN LOGISTIC REGRESSION, QASS Series Paper 07-135, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: Heckman Selection Model: How to deal with missing observations?** - Next by Date:
**st: listcoef** - Previous by thread:
**st: interaction effect without one of main effects** - Next by thread:
**st: -estout- install problem fixed** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |