[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Scott Merryman" <smerryman@kc.rr.com> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: Superimposing graphs |

Date |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:45:54 -0600 |

I am not sure why this didn't work. Using the auto data set, the comparable commands would be twoway (scatter mpg weight if fore == 0) /// (qfit mpg weight if fore == 0) /// (scatter mpg weight if fore == 1 ) /// (qfit mpg weight if fore == 1) which works fine for me. However, like your example, this returns an error: twoway (scatter mpg weight if fore == 0 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 0) /// (scatter mpg weight if fore == 1 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 1) 0| invalid name invalid syntax r(198); Though if we do just one set of -twoway (scatter...|| qfit...)- it works. Again, I think the problem binding () and separating ||. Either notation works, but combining doesn't seem like a good idea. When it gets to capture -noi .Graph : .twowaygraph_g.new- (-set trace on- for all the details) it appears the outer set of parentheses is stripped. So twoway (scatter mpg weight if fore == 0 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 0) becomes essentially -twoway scatter... || qfit...- : = capture noi .Graph : .twowaygraph_g.new scatter mpg weight if fore == 0 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 0 In this syntax: twoway (scatter mpg weight if fore == 0 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 0) /// (scatter mpg weight if fore == 1 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 1) there are no outer parentheses = capture noi .Graph : .twowaygraph_g.new (scatter mpg weight if fore == 0 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 0) (scatter mpg weight if fore == 1 || qfit mpg weight if fore == 1) 0| invalid name And so it is views each ( ) as one command. Of course, none of the above may be correct, but it is how I read the log file. The moral seems to be don't try to bind() what should be separated|| Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner- > statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Branko Milanovic > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:35 PM > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: RE: st: Superimposing graphs > > > Scott, > > Unfortunately, it does not work. What I find strange is that > > twoway (scatter capture lngdpppp if year==1988 & group==1 || qfit > capture lngdpppp if year==1988 & group==1) > > Works quite fine. But if I repeat the same thing for another year (on > the same figure) it does NOT work. But then if I take that another year > and plot it alone (just to check if something may be wrong with it), the > graph works again. O, it is only when they are together that the things > do not work. (On a related note, it seems to me that the new twoway > options have a fair number of bugs.) > > Best, b > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**RE: st: Superimposing graphs***From:*"Branko Milanovic" <bmilanovic@carnegieendowment.org>

- Prev by Date:
**st: problem of stset and stsum** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: problem with graphs by() option.** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Superimposing graphs** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Superimposing graphs** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |