[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Re: RE: Silverman Test for modes
Thanks. Will work on option 3.
I also apologize for the use of html. I was on the road and used my web
browser to send the message which unfortunately defaulted to html. I
usually use an email program which uses plain text as the default.
Professor of Economics and Statistics
Cal State LA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Cox" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: 11/28/2004 8:54 AM
Subject: st: RE: Silverman Test for modes
> If I understand this correctly:
> You may have discovered bug(s) and/or limitation(s)
> in -silvtest-. So the main options appear to be
> 1. Inform the authors and hope that they will
> fix it or explain what you are doing wrong
> from their point of view. Last time I looked the senior
> author was not a member of Statalist.
> 2. Fix it yourself.
> 3. Ignore -silvtest- and do this directly with
> -bootstrap- and -kdensity-.
> The last would seem by far the easiest. A program
> of the order of 10 lines long would appear to be
> needed to produce the mode count.
> I am not clear from your posting whether 50
> is also the number of observations in (one
> of) your real datasets. From my experience
> the number of modes identified by kernel
> density estimation can be very labile for
> datasets that small. This may be _precisely_
> why you are doing this.
> However, there is an extra generic problem
> that is very simple but also seems crucial.
> If you are counting modes as local peaks
> on the density, then minor modes that
> would not be taken seriously in practice
> are necessarily included in the count.
> I've found in similar problems a simple
> approach much more illuminating than this
> one. Loop over a range of kernel widths,
> and track the modes as they disappear
> and/or appear. Genuine modes can be
> expected to persist, and freak modes
> to fade away.
> email@example.com (converted from original HTML)
> I am attempting to implement the silverman test using the procedures
> outlined by this earlier posting and from the STATA Journal:
> "STB-38 snp13 . Nonparametric assessment of multimodality for univariate
> (help warpdenm if installed) . . . . Salgado-Ugarte, Shimizu,
> 7/97 pp.27--35; STB Reprints Vol 7, pp.232--243
> implementation of smoothed bootstrap procedure of Silverman for
> multimodality assessment
> With the ado-files included you can bootstrap kde's and later to count the
> number of modes one by one interectivelly or automatically with the
> program and sending the result listing to a log file (to keep track of any
> single result)."
> I have successfully installed the files and can get the procedure to run.
> I am having some problems with the results. To check the process, I
> generated a sample of 50 observations: the first 25 observations are
> equal to the value 10; observations 26-50 are equal to the value of 100,
> so the sample has exactly 2 modes. However, there are two interesting
> problems arising from testing for the number of modes:
> 1. The number of bootstrap samples that can be generated are limited to
> the number of elements in the original sample (in this case 50).
> 2. Each bootstrap sample returns only 1 mode, so that the result is
> fail to reject the null of 1 mode (even though there is clearly two modes
in my example).
> I have exhausted numerous possibilities of changing the different
> for this test, different examples and data sets and always get 1 mode.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* For searches and help try: