[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Renzo Comolli" <renzo.comolli@yale.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: endogenous switching [was st: To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>] |

Date |
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:45:30 -0500 |

Dear Irfan, I am not sure why you are using logit for the migration step. If there are good reasons to use logit instead of probit what I say in the following might need to be modified or might not apply altogether Your case appears to be a case of Lee 1978 model, explained both on Maddala "limited dependent variable" book, and in Greene's textbook under the heading "treatment effect". If you want to estimate your model by full information maximum likelihood, you can use -movestay- . findit movestay There are a couple of warnings on statalist about it, read them! If you want to estimate the model using the twostep procedure, you can either follow the procedure I detail or read the post listed below. I realize it might be to difficult too understand without having read one of the three references above: 1. Estimate the reduced form probit on the same x variables you put in the wage equations and the extra variables that belong to the selection equation (forget about the wage difference at this stage) 2. gen mills = normden(gammahat)/norm(gammahat) if place==1 //urban 3. replace mills = -normden(gammahat)/(1-norm(gammahat)) if place==0 //rural 4. gen copy_of_mills_for_safekeeping=mills 5. regress log_income x-variables mills if place==1 6. replace mills=0 7. predict ln_w_hat_urban, xb 8. replace mills=copy_of_mills_for_safekeeping //i don't think this passage is strictly speakig necessary but... 9. regress log_income x-variables mills if place==0 10. replace mills=0 11. predict ln_w_hat_rural, xb 12. drop mills copy_of_mills_for_safekeeping 13. gen difference_hat=ln_w_hat_urban-ln_w_hat_rural 14. estimate structural probit using difference_hat and the other selection variables. There is also a very clever trick explained by Mike Johnson that saves you a lot of work, but be carful because I believe the sign of one of the coefficients of the inverse mills ratios get switched around (I did not have time to look into this more), so when you go and interpret the results watch out! http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00562.html Best, Renzo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- *From sirfan@zab.net.pk To undisclosed-recipients: ; Subject st: To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Date Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:45:25 +0500 (PKT) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Dear All I am trying to estimte a rural to urban migration model where one of the regressors is a hypothetical rural-urban wage difference. The wage difference is estimted by seperately estimating wages for rural non-migrants and urban migrants and then subtracting. The issue is that the wage difference is endogenous to the logit(migration) model and should be estimated in a two-step procedure. The literature suggests using Heckman. But I cannot figure how to enter an endogenous wage difference (of two variables) in the Heckman syntax. Any assitance will be appreciated. irfan * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: reg3 with Probit** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Console version of Stata/SE for Macintosh now available** - Previous by thread:
**st: some more questions on panel regressions** - Next by thread:
**Re: endogenous switching [was st: To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>]** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |