[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
May Boggess <mboggess@stata.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: biprobit: test for difference in marginal effects |

Date |
04 Nov 2004 13:38:05 -0600 |

On Thursday, Wenhui Wei wrote: > I'm runing a biprobit model (two treatment modes) and get two sets > marginal effects by the MFX command. > > > My quesiton is: for a certain variable, for example, gender (with male > as the base), how to test whether its estimated marginal effects are > significant different in the 2 equations. i.e. the marginal effect of > female in treatment mode 1 is significantly different from that in > treatment mode 2? > > test command only test for the difference in the estimated > coefficients, not marginal effects. > We can do this by saving the marginal effects and their covariance matrix as estimation results and then use -test-. Let's begin with an example we can work with: clear sysuse auto set seed 12345 gen y1=uniform()>0.5 gen y2=uniform()>0.5 biprobit y1 y2 mpg for I am interested in the marginal effect for for=1 and for=0. I am going to use a matrix to pass the numbers into the -at()- option of -mfx-: matrix A1=(20, 1) mfx, var(mpg) at(A1) tr(2) mat m1=e(Xmfx_dydx) mat D1=(.32062124, .00432451, .00432453, .11510433, -.0019256, -.0019256, -.00114118) When you use the -tracelvl()- option on -mfx- you get to the see the second derivatives that a calculated so -mfx- can use the delta method to get the standard error of the marginal effect. -mfx- doesn't save those guys in a matrix for us, so we'll have to copy and paste them in by hand. Same thing for the marginal effect at for=0: matrix A0=(20, 0) mfx, var(mpg) at(A0) tr(2) mat m0=e(Xmfx_dydx) mat D0= (.28952027, 0, .00463938, .19246524, 0, -.00111842, .00006737) mat D=D1\D0 mat list D Now, to get the covariance matrix for these two marginal effects, I need the covariance matrix for the coefficients of the model: mat V=e(V) Then multiply: mat COV=D*V*D' mat rownames COV = m1 m0 mat colnames COV = m1 m0 mat list COV To be able to test if the two marginal effects are the same, I want to use a Wald test. This is done in Stata using the command -test-. I can take advantage of that by posting the marginal effects and the covariance matrix as estimation results. Before I do so, I have to make sure the rows and columns are labeled appropriately, which means, mathing the names on the covariance matrix COV: mat b=[m1[1,1],m0[1,1]] mat colnames b = m1 m0 mat list b eret post b COV eret display mat list e(b) mat list e(V) You can see the marginal effects and the covariance matrix are now stored in the e() results. So now we can use test: test _b[m1]=_b[m0] --May mmb@stata.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Re: Windows Service pack 2***From:*Friedrich Huebler <huebler@rocketmail.com>

**Re: st: biprobit: test for difference in marginal effects***From:*Wenhui Wei <weiwenhui@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: biprobit: test for difference in marginal effects***From:*Wenhui Wei <weiwenhui@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: biprobit: test for difference in marginal effects** - Next by Date:
**st: Stata and Excel** - Previous by thread:
**st: biprobit: test for difference in marginal effects** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: biprobit: test for difference in marginal effects** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |