Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: Biprobit vs biprob


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: Biprobit vs biprob
Date   Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:44:01 -0000

.  search biprob, historical

Keyword search

        Keywords:  biprob
          Search:  (1) Official help files, FAQs, Examples, SJs, and STBs

Search of official help files, FAQs, Examples, SJs, and STBs


STB-33  sg61  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Bivariate probit models
        (help biprob if installed)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J. W. Hardin
        9/96    pp.15--20; STB Reprints Vol 6, pp.152--158
        commands for estimating three different two-equation probit
        models; biprobit available in Stata 6

In other words, the only reason to use -biprob- is that you are 
using Stata 5. (-biprob- won't work in Stata 4 or earlier.) 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Friedrich Huebler
 
> -findit biprob- points to STB-33, which shows that -biprob- was
> written by someone at Stata Corporation in 1996. I don't know how it
> is different from -biprobit-.
> 
Richard Williams 
 
> > Since no one else has responded -- I do not have a command -biprob-
> > on my computer, nor does -findit biprob- produce such a command. 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index