[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression |

Date |
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:29:59 -0500 |

At 08:01 AM 10/22/2004 -0700, SamL wrote:

A variation on that concern: You'll occasionally see statements like "The effect of education is significant for whites but not for blacks" - which is true but when you look at the actual coefficients they are very similar for the 2 groups. They probably don't significantly differ from each other; the fact that the coefficient is significant in one group but not the other probably just reflects differences in sample size. When doing group comparisons, just looking at whether coefficients within each group are statistically significant can be very misleading if you then use that as a basis for making group comparisons. As Sam says, you should do formal tests of the group differences.Even if you believe every group has a different coefficient, I would also estimate the pooled model and use interactions to test whether the coefficients really are different across groups. If you only estimate separate models for each group, you are unable to test the assumption (unless you simply eyeball coefficients and make an ad hoc decision). There are some other issues to consider (e.g., is it appropriate to assume the same error structure for the different groups?) but the pooled model seems a place to start, at least in my area of research and perhaps in yours as well. Hope this helps. Sam

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

FAX: (574)288-4373

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression***From:*Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu>

**Re: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression***From:*SamL <saml@demog.berkeley.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Dummy Variables vs. Subgroup Models in Logistic Regression** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |