Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Re: sample size calculation

From   Richard Williams <>
Subject   Re: st: Re: sample size calculation
Date   Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:52:25 -0500

At 12:28 PM 9/30/2004 +0900, Joseph Coveney wrote:
It seems as Ricardo's authors are assaying nicotine or its metabolites in some
tissue (placenta, perhaps). In pharmacokinetics, variation often *is*
expressed in terms of the coefficient of variation, as Clint suggests. If
Ricardo's authors intended to say that the standard deviation is 15% instead of
15 ng/mg, and if they contemplated using Bonferroni's inequality to adjust
alpha for two comparisons among the three groups, then

-sampsi 100 115, alpha(0.025) power(0.8) sd1(15) sd2(15)-

gives 43. Here, I'm assuming that power, not beta, is 80%. It's possible that
Ricardo's authors' article is peppered with unintentional errors and omissions
in describing things, such as power and the scale for variation.
I think you meant

sampsi 100 110, alpha(0.025) power(0.8) sd1(15) sd2(15)

At least, that is what gives me an N of 43; the original command gives Ns of 20.

Yes, part of what confuses me about the original problem is the use of both percents and non-percents. You get the feeling something is missing or misstated; but then I am far more used to doing secondary analysis of large data sets than I am problems like this. I suppose another possibility is that the 15 ng/mg is correct but then it gets converted into some sort of percentage?

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW (personal):
WWW (department):

* For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index