[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Neumayer,E" <E.Neumayer@lse.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: constraints in reg3 |

Date |
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:33:08 +0100 |

Hi, this takes up a thread from about 4 weeks ago. Kit Baum clarified that if you do 1. reg y x1 x2 2. reg y1 x1 x2 3. reg y2 x1 x2 and y = y1 + y2, then the coefficient vector of model 1 is the sum of the coefficient vectors on models 2 and 3. I did this with xtpcse for data that have both cross-sectional and time-series dimension and find this to be true, of course. However, if I specify xtpcse, corr(ar1) then the coefficient vectors of models 2 and 3 no longer add up to the coefficient vector of model 1. I presume this is because xtpcse, corr(ar1) uses Prais-Winsten, whereas xtpcse without the corr(ar1) option uses OLS. I have two questions: a. Can anyone explain why the coefficient vectors of models 2 and 3 no longer add up to the coefficient vector of model 1 if xtpcse, corr(ar1) is used? b. Should I accept that the coefficient vectors no longer add up or should I artificially restrict them to be the same? Any help greatly appreciated. Eric Neumayer -----Original Message----- From: Kit Baum [mailto:kitbaum@mac.com] Sent: 25 August 2004 21:45 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: constraints in reg3 Eric said I have a dependent variable y, which is the sum of 2 components, such that y = y1 + y2. I want to regress y on x1 and x2. I also want to regress each one of y1 and y2 on the same explanatory variables x1 and x2 to assess their effect on each sub-component of y. If I typed 1. reg y x1 x2 2. reg y1 x1 x2 3. reg y2 x1 x2 then I would have no guarantee that the estimated coefficients in regressions 2 and 3 on the individual components of y (i.e. y1 and y2) are compatible with the estimated coefficient on the aggregate dependent variable y. As far as I understand I can ensure compatibility by estimating the model: (with constraints) When there are linear relations between the dependent variables, one cannot estimate a full system. That is well-known when, e.g., the dep vars add up to 1, as in the case of budget or portfolio shares. But it is true here too, and if you think about it it must be so. This is not reg3, in the sense of 3SLS, since there are no instruments; it is really SURE. But you can't do SURE on this problem (which is why I'm capturing the result; otherwise it would stop). On the other hand, you don't need to use a systems estimator and constraints (and we know that SURE with identical regressors is the same as . Check out the degree to which the coefficient vector on model 1 compares with the sum of the coefficient vectors on models 2 and 3. That is not by chance. Kit webuse klein,clear capt noi sureg ( wagepriv consump yr) ( wagegovt consump yr) ( wagetot consump yr) reg wagepriv consump yr mat p = e(b) reg wagegovt consump yr mat g = e(b) reg wagetot consump yr mat t = e(b) mat check = t - p - g mat list p mat list g mat list t mat list check * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: constraints in reg3***From:*Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: Royston's mvis ado and version questions** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Royston's mvis ado and version questions** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: Royston's mvis ado and version questions** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: constraints in reg3** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |