Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Re: two stage probit


From   Patricia Sourdin <patricia.sourdin@adelaide.edu.au>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Re: two stage probit
Date   Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:40:30 +0930

Thanks, I found it yesterday.
Patricia

Quoting Christopher F Baum <baum@bc.edu>:

> On Sep 14, 2004, at 2:33, statalist-digest wrote:
> 
> >
> > Seems like two stage probit is the flavour of the month!  I have 
> > recently read
> > a paper that does what you did (Bernheim et al 2001) and to get the 
> > standard
> > errors, he uses the bootstrap.  Not sure if the results are reliable, 
> > but a
> > simple way of incorporating predicted values into your second stage.
> > Patricia
> 
> See
> http://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v3y2003i2p157-167.html
> 
> Kit
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index