Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: Scheme error message

From   "Nick Cox" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: Scheme error message
Date   Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:11:21 +0100

Schemes haven't been documented yet for good reasons, 
because they are not yet stable. That is, StataCorp 
are following the logic Constantine mentions. They 
don't want to provide documentation which will then 
later be broken. However, scheme documentation was 
promised at the Boston meeting as coming pretty soon. 

The same is true of many other things. None of the 
low-level graphics stuff is documented at all. The 
alternative of documenting _everything_ that is not 
proprietary would undoubtedly bloat the manuals further, 
most of the information however being too arcane 
for almost all users. 

Also, freezing Stata between releases, apart from 
fixes, commits StataCorp to elephantine pregnancies
and deprives keen users of lots of nice things in the 
interim. Just witness how interested several people are 
in the enhancements to -ci, binomial-. 

So I disagree here with Constantine. 

More importantly, he and others agreeing have some degree 
of choice here, e.g. choosing not to -update- or (more 
realistically) just choosing not to use new features 
added since release (but how are these known about if 
they are not documented?). 


Constantine Daskalakis is discontented: 
> I've had exactly the same problem it seems. After spending 2 
> hours trying 
> to figure out what I was doing wrong and a couple of messages 
> to Stata tech 
> support, here's the final answer (haven't had the chance to 
> check that out yet):
> At 02:56 PM 8/31/2004, Stata Technical Support wrote:
> >Constantine,
> >
> >The structure of the schemes has changed.  You shouldn't use 
> the file named
> >"s2color.scheme" as your model.  Instead, you need to use 
> "scheme-s2color.
> >scheme" which can be found in the same folder (C:\Program 
> Files\Stata8\ado\
> >\updates\s).
> I am quite annoyed with Stata lately. It seems that there are 
> far too many 
> "enhancements" and "features" that are undocumented or plain 
> contradictory 
> to what the manual says. I do not want to waste hours of my 
> time to read 
> the manual and do things right and then have that all go down 
> the drain 
> just because Stata have decided to redo the whole thing and 
> forgot to tell anyone.
> Major changes that go against the manual should be reserved for new 
> versions, NOT updates (unless it is to fix something that is 
> really wrong). 
> But perhaps, it's just my nature to gripe.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index