[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
RE: st: Binomial confidence intervals
Here are two solutions to Ronán's problem:
> Reading the paper and examining their graphs, it's really much of a
> muchness between Wilson and Jeffreys, which seem to suffer
> less from the
> lucky/unlucky p and N combinations than the Agresti. Agresti
> gets third place, but did anyone reading the paper spot a compelling
> advantage of Wilson over Jeffreys, or the other way around? I didn't.
> I have been using the Wilson interval since Nick wrote -ciw-, simply
> because I found -ciwi- an easy-to-remember command name.
* For searches and help try: