Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Binomial confidence intervals


From   Ronán Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Binomial confidence intervals
Date   Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:55:32 +0100

Paul Seed wrote:

Dear all,

As I don't have access to a decent Stats library here, I tried to obtain
the recommended paper (Brown, Cai, & DasGupta.
Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. Statistical Science, 2001,
16, pp. 101-133.)  over the internet; but it is currently behind a "rolling
firewall", until 2005.

Would anyone who has seen it hazard a comment on which of the
new methods  - Wilson, Jeffreys or Agresti they would prefer for
small samples.

Reading the paper and examining their graphs, it's really much of a muchness between Wilson and Jeffreys, which seem to suffer less from the lucky/unlucky p and N combinations than the Agresti. Agresti certainly gets third place, but did anyone reading the paper spot a compelling advantage of Wilson over Jeffreys, or the other way around? I didn't.

I have been using the Wilson interval since Nick wrote -ciw-, simply because I found -ciwi- an easy-to-remember command name.


--

Ronan M Conroy (rconroy@rcsi.ie)
Senior Lecturer in Biostatistics
Royal College of Surgeons
Dublin 2, Ireland
+353 1 402 2431 (fax 2764)
--------------------
Just say no to drug reps
http://www.nofreelunch.org/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index