[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Transformed values in logistic regression |

Date |
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:59:47 -0500 |

At 08:27 PM 8/26/2004 -0700, Ricardo Ovaldia wrote:

While I am not an expert in creatinine (whatever that is) I am inclined to agree with you. You can always plug in implausible/impossible numbers and come up with a prediction, e.g. how much would somebody make if they had -2,000,000 years of education? I've never heard of a rule which says that x = 1 has to be a plausible or even possible value. For presentation purposes, you might want to scale your variables in ways which make them easier to understand and present (e.g. measure income in thousands of dollars rather than in dollars) but it is not essential. There may be other good reasons for not doing what you are doing, but the reason given seems odd to me, unless maybe it violates some sort of convention in your field. If you want to make this reviewer happy, maybe you could measure creatinine in milligrams instead of grams or whatever happens to be reasonable so that a 1 unit increase in x is possible.Specifically we were interested in modeling case-control status as a function of several patient covariates including serum creatinine which in our data ranges from 0.11 to 1.98. Because of skewness and to make the odds ratio independent of the units measurement, we decided to log-transform the creatinine values before entering them into our logistic model. However the reviewer wrote "Using a log-transform for creatine is absurd because a 1-unit increase in ln(x) is equivalent to increasing x by a factor of 2.718 which is in the realm of impossibility" Is he correct? Isn't the coefficient estimated such that the predicted values are within the range of the data and this only a problem if you attempt to extrapolate beyond the data range? What I am missing?

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

FAX: (574)288-4373

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: time series data***From:*Christopher F Baum <baum@bc.edu>

**st: Transformed values in logistic regression***From:*Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Transformed values in logistic regression** - Next by Date:
**st: modelling asynchronous interval-censored data with time-varyingcovariates** - Previous by thread:
**st: Transformed values in logistic regression** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Transformed values in logistic regression** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |