Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE:st: Part II: An error in the xtabond-description


From   Giovanni Bruno <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE:st: Part II: An error in the xtabond-description
Date   Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:19:02 +0200

David

I agree that S1 uses 1-step residuals. The problem is about S2 (last formula at 
page 32 in the xt manual), which is based on A2 that necessarily uses 1-step 
residuals. This is not the 2-step Sargan in Arellano and Bond (1991) paper, 
formula (10) p. 282 that employs 2-step residuals.  

Giovanni

 
> While it is possible to define a Sargan statistic that uses the one-step
> moment conditions and the two-step weighting matrix, this is not the
> one-step Sargan test suggested by Arellano and Bond (1991).  The one-step
> Sargan statistic reported by -xtabond- is the s_1 statistic suggested by
> Arellano and Bond (1991) page 282, it uses the one-step residuals.
> 
> 
>   --David
>     [email protected]
> 
> References
> 
> Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) "Some tests of specification for panel
> data:
> Monte Carlo evidence and an application to Employment Equations", The Review
> of Economic Studies, 58(2) 277-297.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 


-- 
Giovanni Bruno
Istituto di Economia Politica, Universit� Bocconi
Via U. Gobbi, 5, 20136 Milano
Italy
tel. + 02 5836 5411
fax. + 02 5836 5438
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index