[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Bo Cutter" <bowman.cutter@ucr.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: simulating choices for nested logit |

Date |
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:44:40 -0700 |

I want to find standard errors for the number of people who make each of the 1st level nest choices in a 2-level nested logit. I used the simulate command to do this by first drawing from the covariance matrix generated by the nested logit model using the drawnorm command, then generating predicted probabilities using the generated set of coefficients, and then adding them up across all people. I tested my program which generates the predicted probabilities against the Stata command and it matches up exactly. However, when I run the simulation, the means of the simulation does not equal the choice numbers generated from the Stata predict command. I.e. sum of predicted for three nests is: . predict double p_act, p1; . tabstat p_act if (choice==1|choice==8|choice==13),by(choice) s(sum); (I am summing over one choice in each nest) Summary for variables: p_act by categories of: choice nest | sum ---------+---------- 1 | 278.3562 2 | 60.31723 3 | 182.3266 ---------+---------- Total | 521 -------------------- my probability prediction program matches this (as well as the individual probabilities) when using the identical coefficients the relevant command is: tabstat `tempprob' if (choice==1|choice==8|choice==13),by(choice) s(sum)save where `tempprob' is the variable that holds the first-level nest choice probabilities (and the saved results are what I assign to my return scalars). , but the mean of the simulation (2000 draws) is: nest mean 1 278.89 2 70.78 3 171.62 I expected the mean of the simulation to match up to the predicted choices from the Stata command, is there a theoretical reason they might not match? I also saved the coefficient draws from the simulation, and their means match the nested logit coefficient vector almost exactly, so there is nothing wrong there. Thanks, * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: Testing for endogeneity with xtabond** - Next by Date:
**st: log transformation question** - Previous by thread:
**st: Testing for endogeneity with xtabond** - Next by thread:
**st: log transformation question** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |