Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re:areg vs xtreg,fe


From   Christopher F Baum <baum@bc.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: Re:areg vs xtreg,fe
Date   Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:27:35 +0100

On Jun 3, 2004, at 7:33 AM, Clive wrote:


Stupid question, really! I forgot that, of course, FE models models the
time series whilst 'averaging out' the cross-sectional variation, which
- -areg- does not. I knew that: honest!

Still, the quandary of whether or not robust standard errors under FE is
possible remains. I notice that FE is the only model (FGLS and -areg-
included) that reports sensible constant values for my data, which is a
plus for me.
Wrong, wrong. The model underlying areg, "LSDV" (least squares dummy variable), aka the within estimator (because it will only have explanatory power if the variation WITHIN each individual's timeseries is systematically related to the variation in the regressors WITHIN that TS) is algebraically identical to that estimated by xtreg, fe. The difference is that, in Intercooled Stata, areg will not work if the number of panel units > 2000, and xtreg,fe will, since it does not actually have to create all of those dummies.

The reason why xtreg does not have a robust option and areg does, I imagine, relates to the date of each of those routines. xtreg also does not allow for timeseries ops (D. F. L.) which is a real nuisance. But when the TS ops were added to Stata, no one went back and rewrote xtreg; they wrote a bunch of groovy new XT commands. So there is no technical reason why xtreg, fe could not be robustified.



*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index