[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Kieran McCaul <K.McCaul@curtin.edu.au> |

To |
"'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: Re: RE: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution |

Date |
Mon, 31 May 2004 12:52:25 +0800 |

Syed, If you type 'help swilk' that will guide you to the Shapiro-Francia test that seems to be better suited to larger sample sizes. You might also want to look at the help file for sktest. This has a modification by Royston that I think is for large samples. You need to remember that when you are doing a statistical test you are testing an hypothesis. With goodness-of-fit tests the null hypothesis is that any difference between your observed distribution and your expected or assumed distribution is no greater than would be expected by chance alone. Like any significance test, the large your sample size, the smaller the difference that you will be able to detect as 'statistically significant'. Just because some difference that you are detcting is statistically significant, doesn't mean that it is an important difference. This also applies to goodness-of-fit tests. The test might be finding a significant difference, but with a large sample, this difference might be quite small and could be ignored. Kieran -----Original Message----- From: Syed Gillani [mailto:syed@saudionline.com.sa] Sent: Monday, 31 May 2004 12:30 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Re: RE: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution Thanks Kieran, The problem is that I have around 6,000 observations and Shapiro-Wilk reject the null hypothesis of normality after all transformations, even ln(x). I wnated to test whether the original distribution is really lognormal, although it certainly looks like one. For that, I wanted to use Kolmogorov-Smirnov test but it need definition of the distribution being tested. I do not know how to define lognormal distribution for ksmirnov. Would really apperciate help there. Syed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kieran McCaul" <K.McCaul@curtin.edu.au> To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 3:59 AM Subject: st: RE: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution > If your variable is x and you suspect it is lognormal, then ln(x) should be > normal. > You could check this by looking at a histogram of ln(x) with a normal > distribution overlaid. Check skewness and kurtosis. Have a look at a Q-Q > plot. Run a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or Shapiro-Wilks test. > > The usual sort of stuff you would do when checking normality of a variable. > > Kieran > > -----Original Message----- > From: Syed Gillani [mailto:syed@saudionline.com.sa] > Sent: Monday, 31 May 2004 4:13 AM > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Subject: st: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution > > > Dear all, > > How can I test whether a variable is lognormally distributed? > > Syed > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: Re: RE: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: wishlist - active dataset name in title bar** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: Re: RE: goodness-of-fit test for lognormal distribution** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |