[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: problem with shared frailty cox model
I tried the shared frailty option in a cox proportional hazard model to account for the within-family correlation of my pedigree data.
After several hours (!!!) I got a convergence error when estimating the frailty variance.
This just happened in a larger dataset (for example in 1500 individuals from 600 families, 1-4 members within a family); in a smaller subset it's working fine. Is it a memory problem ? Are there any requirements for the coding of the shared frailty variable ?
I would appreciate any suggestions very much since I have to analyze this (total) dataset very soon.
I believe that the standard approach is to use a share
frailty model. This can be done using -stcox-'s
--- "Fischer, Marcus" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I wish to evaluate associations between prospective
> disease risk and one or more genetic or
> environmental covariates, using data from families
> ascertained because of the disease statuses of some
> of their members. The population consists of
> nonoverlapping families each containing one or more
> individuals. Both disease occurences and covariates
> may be correlated within families.
> Is it possible to account for the within-family
> correlation in a cox proportional hazard model ? If
> so, how ?
> Can I just use the cluster(family-identifier) option
> to work with the robust variance-covariance matrix ?
> Thanks for your help.
* For searches and help try: