[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: multiple imputation + transformation of parameters
Michael is having problems posting this:
-------- Original Message --------
I want to report confidence intervals for odds ratios. It's clear
that -MIFIT- is working with the underlying betas even when one uses the
logistic command. What STATA reports as the MI estimate for the odds
ratio is the exponentiated value of the betas averaged across the
It makes more sense to me to transform the betas before the
averaging. My sense is that one should do all steps in the analyses
before implementing Rubin's rules.
Does this sound right? Can anyone make a counter-argument?
E. Michael Foster
Professor of Health Policy and Administration and of Demography
Associate Editor, /Developmental Psychology
* For searches and help try: