[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
TEWODAJ MOGUES <tmogues@students.wisc.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Fwd: xtabond: displaying the instrument matrix |

Date |
Mon, 03 May 2004 20:09:50 -0500 |

Hi, A related question to my question below, which might help me answer it myself: Is there a way to ask stata to display the instrument matrix being used in any given command? I tried searching under "post-estimation commands" but didn't find (anyway, strictly speaking, this is not a post-estimation issue, but I didn't know where else to look.) Tewodaj ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ Tewodaj Mogues Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin - Madison 427 Lorch St. #317, Taylor Hall Madison, WI 53706

---Begin Message---

FromTEWODAJ MOGUES <tmogues@students.wisc.edu> ToStata _ <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Subjectlags of the x's in xtabond DateMon, 03 May 2004 19:43:48 -0500 Hi Stata users, I am setting up a distributed lag model in xtabond, and I am a bit puzzled about what xtabond is doing exactly when I restrict the instrument set of the distributed lags. Say I want to model: y(it) = y(i t-1) + x(it) + x(i t-1) + e(it) where x is a predetermined variable. Suppose I want to restrict the instrumens of x to just one further lag of x. There are two ways to write the command, and they should be identical: 1. xtabond y , lags(1) pre(x, lag(1,1) ) 2. xtabond y , lags(1) pre(x lag_x, lag(0,1) ) where lag_x is a variable I created by typing: generate lag_x = L.x These two commands give different results, which is puzzling. On the other hand, 2. gives, strangely enough, identical results to the following command: 3. xtabond y , lags(1) pre(x, lag(1,2) ) My question is: If I want to restrict the instruments of x to just one lag, which of the commands above should I use? Asked more open-endedly: What is it that 1. is doing versus that which 2. and 3. are doing in terms of the instrument set they are setting up? Thanks for any thoughts on this. Tewodaj ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ Tewodaj Mogues Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin - Madison 427 Lorch St. #317, Taylor Hall Madison, WI 53706---End Message---

- Prev by Date:
**st: Programming FGT using weights** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Adjusted mean.** - Previous by thread:
**st: Programming FGT using weights** - Next by thread:
**st: SFA - variance parameter** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |