[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Monica L. Parra Torrado" <mparrat@bu.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction |

Date |
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:04:28 -0400 |

Tewodaj, Thanks for the answer, you are right in the reference manual says the estimation uses random effects. Regarding the prediction, however, when we estimate using xtreg with random effects we are able to predict them, so I wonder if there's a way I can recover the predicted ones in the context of xtabond given that we are differencing? Best, Mónica L. -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of TEWODAJ MOGUES Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:18 PM To: Stata _ Subject: Re: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction Hi Monica: First of all, it is my understanding, in contrast to the posting by Jacob in response to Kate (see below), that the underlying model that the xtabond estimator first-differences takes the individual effects are taken to be random effects, not fixed effects. This can be verified in the Stata reference manual for Su-Z, p.291 bottom. Given that, one cannot get an estimate of the individual effect alpha(i), since it is not taken to be a fixed unknown parameter but a random variable. But a related question has been preoccupying me too: When the structural model that the Arellano-Bond estimator (which is what the xtabond is) estimates is differenced, not only is the individual effect swept out, but also any constant (ie. intercept) that the structural model may have had. However, xtabond produces estimates not only for the slope coefficients, but also for a constant. What should I make of that? Is it "sneaking" in an intercept in the differenced model before estimating it, i.e. is it estimating y(it) = alpha + D x(it) * beta + D e(it) (where D is the Delta sign) instead of estimating (what I think it should be doing): y(it) = D x(it) * beta + D e(it) ? or is it estimating the latter, but computing the constant alpha from the estimates of beta? Anyone know where xtabond is getting the intercept estimate from? Thanks, Tewodaj Message: 16 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:54:50 -0400 From: "Monica L. Parra Torrado" <mparrat@bu.edu> Subject: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction Dear Stata List, I have some xtabond estimations and need to predict the fixed effects coefficient but the command only allows predicting delta Y (the difference of dependent variable Y) and delta e (the difference of the error term). I am not sure it is possible to predict such coefficient since the estimation is done in differences and the fixed effect term disappears. Does someone have an idea of what could I do? Thanks, Mónica L. From: Kate Ivanova <kivanova@u...> Date: Tue Mar 30, 2004 9:11 am Subject: st: xtabond command I am trying to use the xtabond command but am puzzled whether the estimator that Stata produces is designed for fixed or random effects? Also, I do not understand whether the xtabond command automatically first differences all the variables in the model or whether I have to do that separately before I use the command? I would appreciate any help with that From: "Jacob, Jeffry Ankur" <jajacob@m...> Date: Tue Mar 30, 2004 10:34 am Subject: st: RE: xtabond command Hi, Xtabond is for fixed effects estimation. Also, the command automatically first differences the data. You can however specify the lags you want to include as explanatory variables in your model. ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ Tewodaj Mogues Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin - Madison 427 Lorch St. #317, Taylor Hall Madison, WI 53706 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction***From:*TEWODAJ MOGUES <tmogues@students.wisc.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction** - Next by Date:
**st: metan command & binary variables** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: xtabond fixed effect prediction** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |